https://jcdee.com/index.php/jcdee/issue/feed Journal of Child Development, Exceptionality and Education 2026-09-15T11:35:22+00:00 Hasan Said Tortop editorjcdee@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <p data-start="261" data-end="796"><strong data-start="261" data-end="335">The Journal of Child Development, Exceptionality and Education (JCDEE)</strong> is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes original and high-quality research in the fields of <strong data-start="459" data-end="531">child development, exceptionality (special education), and education</strong>. The journal aims to promote international and cross-disciplinary collaboration among researchers, practitioners, and scholars to address contemporary and emerging developmental, educational, and social issues affecting children and individuals with special needs. JCDEE publish articles English. JCDEE is published twice a year, in<strong> June</strong> and <strong>December</strong>.</p> <p data-start="798" data-end="1450"><strong data-start="798" data-end="807">JCDEE</strong> welcomes manuscripts that focus on <strong data-start="843" data-end="1174">child development, inclusive and special education, early childhood education, educational interventions, developmental assessment, family involvement, teacher education, educational psychology, psychological counseling, language and communication development, rehabilitation, social participation, and evidence-based practices</strong>. The journal particularly values studies that integrate theory and practice, encourage interdisciplinary perspectives, and contribute to the development of effective, sustainable, and research-based solutions in the fields of child development, exceptionality, and education.</p> <h2 data-section-id="1gdbp2n" data-start="70" data-end="82"><span role="text"><strong data-start="73" data-end="82">Scope</strong></span></h2> <p data-start="83" data-end="134">JCDEE welcomes manuscripts in the following fields:</p> <ul data-start="136" data-end="958"> <li data-section-id="193kxe9" data-start="136" data-end="157">Child Development</li> <li data-section-id="3eiv7" data-start="158" data-end="179">Special Education</li> <li data-section-id="kcqiie" data-start="180" data-end="203">Inclusive Education</li> <li data-section-id="1xju4js" data-start="204" data-end="228">Educational Sciences</li> <li data-section-id="1p16vgx" data-start="229" data-end="252">Preschool Education</li> <li data-section-id="uuvo7n" data-start="253" data-end="276">Classroom Education</li> <li data-section-id="zryj3a" data-start="277" data-end="307">Curriculum and Instruction</li> <li data-section-id="h30f6g" data-start="308" data-end="350">Educational Measurement and Evaluation</li> <li data-section-id="n1isat" data-start="351" data-end="392">Guidance and Psychological Counseling</li> <li data-section-id="1mvey2z" data-start="393" data-end="407">Psychology</li> <li data-section-id="1rbicwl" data-start="408" data-end="436">Developmental Psychology</li> <li data-section-id="15rvwue" data-start="437" data-end="475">Child and Adolescent Mental Health</li> <li data-section-id="14997zu" data-start="476" data-end="507">Speech and Language Therapy</li> <li data-section-id="1oj5o77" data-start="508" data-end="521">Audiology</li> <li data-section-id="5noz5" data-start="522" data-end="546">Occupational Therapy</li> <li data-section-id="g3amlu" data-start="547" data-end="562">Social Work</li> <li data-section-id="12jmyr6" data-start="563" data-end="574">Nursing</li> <li data-section-id="1hqo39v" data-start="575" data-end="594">Health Sciences</li> <li data-section-id="48fvv0" data-start="595" data-end="608">Sociology</li> <li data-section-id="1sf1vcc" data-start="609" data-end="641">Family and Consumer Sciences</li> <li data-section-id="77nfr" data-start="642" data-end="671">Early Childhood Education</li> <li data-section-id="1nym0em" data-start="672" data-end="717">Developmental Assessment and Intervention</li> <li data-section-id="1qhv3e6" data-start="718" data-end="739">Teacher Education</li> <li data-section-id="7iku0y" data-start="740" data-end="782">Language and Communication Development</li> <li data-section-id="5m7vw8" data-start="783" data-end="809">Rehabilitation Studies</li> <li data-section-id="tmspi5" data-start="810" data-end="868">Evidence-Based Educational and Developmental Practices</li> </ul> https://jcdee.com/index.php/jcdee/article/view/71 The Trajectory of Educational Justice in Zimbabwe’s Post-Independence Education Policies and Reforms (1980-2026): Implications for Future Educational Reforms 2026-09-15T11:35:22+00:00 Angellar Manguvo manguvoa@umkc.edu <p><strong>Purpose</strong></p> <p>This study examines the evolution of Zimbabwe’s post-independence education policies through the lens of educational justice. Drawing on Rawls’ theories of distributive justice and equality of opportunity, and Fraser’s theories of recognition and participatory parity, the study explains how conceptions of educational justice and corresponding policy priorities evolved over time.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Methodology</strong></p> <p>Situated within interpretive and transformative research paradigms, the study employs historical research and interpretive policy analysis to examine major national education policies enacted from 1980 to 2026. Policies and reforms were purposively selected based on their significance to educational justice. These include universal education reforms, the Basic Education Assistance Module, Early Childhood Development initiative, language-in-education reforms, the Inclusive Education policy, and the Policy on the Re-entry of Pregnant Learners. Policy documents were analyzed using deductive coding guided by four analytical domains: redistribution, equality of opportunity, recognition, and participation. The Capability Approach subsequently informed the interpretation of the developmental trajectory by assessing the extent to which successive reforms expanded learners’ capabilities to achieve valued educational outcomes.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Findings</strong></p> <p>The findings reveal that Zimbabwe’s post-independence education policies reflect a progressive broadening of educational justice. Early reforms primarily addressed colonial inequalities through the redistributive expansion of educational access. Subsequent policies increasingly targeted socioeconomic disadvantage, promoted fair equality of opportunity, recognized learner diversity, and strengthened conditions for meaningful participation. Collectively, the reforms demonstrate a cumulative developmental trajectory in which educational justice evolved from a predominantly distributive concern toward a multidimensional policy discourse. Although the developmental trajectory represents important normative progress, interpretation through the Capability Approach suggests that persistent structural and contextual constraints continue to limit learners’ ability to translate educational opportunities into valued life outcomes.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Significance</strong></p> <p>This study contributes to education policy scholarship by introducing the <em>Developmental Trajectory of Educational Justice</em> as a conceptual framework for explaining how educational justice evolves across successive policy reforms. Beyond its theoretical contribution, the framework offers practical guidance for policymakers by demonstrating that educational justice is a dynamic concept requiring continual adaptation as new forms of educational disadvantage emerge. As educational systems respond to new challenges such as curriculum reform, digital inequalities, and the growing integration of artificial intelligence, the framework can inform the design of future educational reforms that anticipate and address emerging injustices.</p> 2026-09-15T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Child Development, Exceptionality and Education https://jcdee.com/index.php/jcdee/article/view/72 Video and digital games: Historical controversies, benefits, and risks for children and adolescents 2026-09-15T11:25:41+00:00 Hanna David hannadav@tauex.tau.ac.il <p>Video and digital games have been the focus of sustained public and scientific debate since their commercial emergence in the late 1970s, particularly regarding their effects on children and adolescents. Early public and scientific discourse frequently portrayed gaming as a source of physical injury, addiction, aggression, social isolation, academic problems, and moral decline. However, subsequent empirical research has produced a substantially more differentiated picture of both the benefits and risks of gaming. This review examines the historical foundations of controversies surrounding video and digital games and synthesizes contemporary evidence concerning their cognitive, emotional, social, therapeutic, and physical effects. . Research indicates that moderate, purposeful gaming may improve visuospatial abilities, attentional control, problem-solving, mood regulation, social connection, and selected educational outcomes. Gaming-based interventions have also demonstrated therapeutic potential, particularly for depressive symptoms and attention-related difficulties among young people. At the same time, important risks remain, especially when gaming becomes excessive, compulsive, or disruptive to everyday functioning. These include repetitive-strain injuries, sleep disruption, problematic gaming, and adverse mental-health and academic outcomes. Evidence concerning violent games and serious real-world aggression remains more contested, with recent research emphasizing relatively small effects and the importance of individual and contextual factors. Overall, the evidence suggests that the developmental consequences of gaming for children and adolescents depend less on gaming itself than on the duration, content, context, and pattern of engagement.</p> 2026-09-15T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Child Development, Exceptionality and Education